Letter – Downsides of solar farms

Published 9:27 pm Wednesday, October 9, 2024

Editor, The Smithfield Times:

Citizens, I want to address Carver Solar’s proposal to develop a 1,138.5-acre solar facility in our county. While the project promises economic and environmental benefits, we must carefully consider its risks before proceeding.

This facility will connect to the regional PJM electric grid, providing power across 13 states and Washington, D.C. The electricity generated here will largely benefit areas far beyond the Isle of Wight borders, leaving our community to bear the environmental and economic risks.

Subscribe to our free email newsletter

Get the latest news sent to your inbox

One major concern is the environmental impact of installing 220,000 solar panels. These large panels contribute to soil erosion and increased water runoff, which could harm local waterways, reduce water quality and disrupt the ecosystems that are vital to our agriculture and natural resources. Local wildlife could lose habitats, and these disruptions may negatively affect our hunting and other activities dependent on a healthy ecosystem.

Another concern is the visual impact on our scenic landscapes, particularly along Route 460. Large solar farms could diminish the rural charm that attracts residents and tourists, lowering property values and harming businesses tied to agriculture and rural tourism. Converting farmland to industrial solar use could reduce the demand for local agriculture, equipment suppliers and other industries dependent on farming.

Moreover, once land is converted for solar use, it is difficult to restore, leaving long-term consequences for future development. We must consider whether this is the best use of our land, particularly when alternatives with less environmental impact might be possible.

While renewable energy is crucial for our future, we must ensure it doesn’t cost our local environment, economy and way of life. It’s imperative that we preserve Isle of Wight County’s land to serve our community first — not the energy needs of a region far beyond our borders.

Let’s make a decision that preserves our land, people and traditions while considering balanced development for a sustainable future.

Patrick Gravel

Smithfield